Critics soon countered that the pieces tested were from medieval materials used to patch the shroud. Those findings were consistent with the first official, specific mention of the shroud in 14th-century Catholic Church history. Skeptics point to carbon dating of shroud fragments done in 1988, when researchers concluded with 95 percent certainty that the samples were from A.D. “Whether it is from the first century or not,” he cautions, “I don’t know if we can be that precise.” “And that is pretty remarkable in itself - that it remains inexplicable to this day.”Īfter nearly 40 years spent researching, writing and speaking about the shroud, Breault acknowledges a gap remains between what experts have theorized and what can be proven “in a definitive fashion” about the enigmatic covering.īreault maintains that centuries of studies, despite countering opinions along the way, have established that the bloodstains and faint images on the shroud are “certainly from a man who died by crucifixion. “After all of the research we’ve done on the shroud, it still remains a mystery,” Breault says. will feature Russ Breault, president and founder of the Atlanta-based Shroud of Turin Education Project. to noon Saturday and again Sunday at 9 a.m., 11 a.m. After all, the debate involving scientists, historians, clerics, believers and nonbelievers on both sides of the authenticity spectrum still rages today and will for many tomorrows. Century Drive (about 4300 South), in Murray.Īny certainty about the ancient sheet’s origins and meaning ultimately will be a matter of faith. History or hoax? Faith or fake? Either way, Utahns will get a chance to make their own judgments this weekend during a free, two-day Shroud of Turin conference at Calvary Chapel Salt Lake, 460 W.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |